Read the passage below and summarize it using one sentence. Type your response in the box at the bottom of the screen. You have 10 minutes to finish this task. Your response will be judge on the quality of your writing and on how well your response presents the key points in the passage.
Compulsory choice of voting suggested as a solution to the problem of declining turnout. However, people and countries stricken by required choice on the far side boosting electoral participation? Shane 43 investigates the social, economic, and political consequences of compelling voters to vote.
There has been plenty of dialogue concerning the required choice lately. Within the UK, above all, as vote rates have declined, several commentators and politicians have begun advocating for obligatory electoral participation. Those in favors of required choice usually cite the importance of participation among all segments of society. Voters of democracies are forced to try to several things within the interest of the general public sensible, they maintain, as well as serving on juries and educating their youngsters, and full participation serves the country as the whole. Those hostile required choices usually argue that, from a democratic theory perspective, the proper to vote implicitly includes a right to not vote. Such a right of self-discipline, they argue, is additional necessary than any social sensible that may accompany high turnout. In fact, opponents of required choice usually contend that the country could also be happier if people who are disinclined to vote don’t seem to be pushed to participate publicly affairs.
Regardless of whether or not one among these sets of arguments is additional persuasive than the opposite, required choice is often used around the world. Many European democracies mandate choice, as do Australia and most of the countries in Latin America. By evaluating results from these countries, it’s potential to assess the mechanics and effects of the required choice.