Read the passage below and summarize it using one sentence. Type your response in the box at the bottom of the screen. You have 10 minutes to finish this task. Your response will be judge on the quality of your writing and on how well your response presents the key points in the passage.
This year’s Nobel Peace Prize justly rewards the thousands of scientists of the international organization global climate change Panel (the 1PCC). These scientists area unit engaged in wonderful, careful work that establishes specifically what the globe ought to expect from global climate change.
The other award winner, former United States vice chairman Albert Gore Jr., has spent way more time telling the United States what to concern. Whereas the IPCC’s estimates and conclusions area unit grounded in careful study, Gore does not appear to be equally restrained.
Gore told the globe in his Academy triumph pic (recently labeled “one-sided” and containing “scientific errors” by a British judge) to expect 20-foot water level rises over this century. He ignores the findings of his Nobel co-winners, the IPCC, WHO concludes that ocean levels can rise between solely a 0.5 foot and 2 feet over this century, with their best expectation being concerning one foot. That is the same as what the globally fledged over the past a hundred and fifty years.
Likewise, Gore agonizes over the accelerated melting of ice in Greenland and what it suggests that for the world, however, overlooks the IPCC’s conclusion that, if sustained, the present rate of melting would add simply 3 ten inches to the ocean level rise by the top of the century. Gore additionally takes no notice of analysis showing that Greenland’s temperatures were higher in 1941 than they are nowadays.
Gore additionally frets concerning the long run of polar bears. He claims they’re drowning as their icy environment disappears. However, the sole scientific study showing any such factor indicates that four polar bears sunken attributable to a storm.
The politician turned filmmaker loses lodge a foreseen rise in heat-related deaths. There is another facet of the story that is inconvenient to mention: rising temperatures can scale back the number of cold spells, that area unit a way larger killer than heat. The simplest study shows that by 2050, heat can claim four hundred, thousand additional lives, but 1.8 million fewer can die attributable to cold. Indeed, per the primary complete survey of the economic effects of global climate change on the globe, warming can really save lives.